Congressional
Statement On Vioxx And Drug
Safety
Modern drugs provide unmistakable and
significant health benefits. It is well recognized that FDA's
drug review is a gold standard. Indeed, we believe that FDA
maintains the highest worldwide standards for drug approval.
FDA grants approval to drugs after a sponsor demonstrates that
they are safe and effective.
Experience has shown that the full magnitude of
some potential risks do not always emerge during the mandatory
clinical trials conducted before approval to evaluate these
products for safety and effectiveness. Occasionally, serious
adverse effects are identified after approval either in
post-marketing clinical trials or through spontaneous reporting
of adverse events.
That is why Congress has supported and FDA has
created a strong post-market drug safety program designed to
assess adverse events identified after approval for all of the
medical products it regulates as a complement to the pre-market
safety reviews required for approval of prescription drugs in
the United States.
Monitoring the drug safety of marketed products
requires close collaboration between our clinical reviewers and
drug safety staff to evaluate and respond to adverse events
identified in ongoing clinical trials or reported to us by
physicians and their patients.
The most recent actions concerning the drug
Vioxx (rofecoxib) illustrates the vital importance of the
ongoing assessment of the safety of a product once it is in
widespread use.
It is important to understand that all approved
drugs pose some level of risk, such as the risks that are
identified in clinical trials and listed on the labeling of the
product. Unless a new drug's demonstrated benefit outweighs its
known risk for an intended population, FDA will not approve the
drug.
However, we cannot anticipate all possible
effects of a drug during the clinical trials that precede
approval. An adverse drug reaction can range from a minor,
unpleasant response to a drug product, to a response that is
sometimes life-threatening or deadly.
Such adverse drug reactions may be expected
(because clinical trial results indicate such possibilities) or
unexpected (because the reaction was not evident in clinical
trials). It may also result from errors in drug prescribing,
dispensing or use.
The issue of how to detect and limit adverse
reactions can be challenging; how to weigh the impact of these
adverse drug reactions against the benefits of these products
on individual patients and the public health is multifaceted
and complex, involving scientific as well as public policy
issues.
Conclusion
In summary, FDA worked actively and vigorously
with Merck to inform public health professionals of what was
known regarding CV risk with Vioxx, and to pursue further
definitive investigations to better define and quantify this
risk.
FDA also reviewed and remained current on new
epidemiologic studies that appeared in the literature. Indeed,
the recent study findings disclosed by Merck, leading to its
decision to voluntarily withdraw Vioxx from the marketplace,
resulted from FDA's vigilance in requiring these long-term
outcome trials to address our concerns.
Detecting, assessing, managing and
communicating the risks and benefits of prescription and
over-the-counter drugs is a highly complex and demanding task.
FDA is determined to meet this challenge by employing
cutting-edge science, transparent policy, and sound decisions
based on the advice of the best experts in and out of the
agency.
We are confident that the additional activities
discussed above will strengthen the agency's program to greater
ensure the safety of medical products that make a major
contribution to the health and quality of life of millions of
Americans.
Medicines that receive FDA approval are among
the safest in the world, and the measures we are taking are
designed to strengthen this quality, as well as consumer
confidence that FDA's processes ensure the highest protection
of the public health.
Reference for Vioxx
Article
U.S. Food and Drug
Administration
Health Related
Websites
The National Cancer
Institute
The National Eye Institute
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute
National Institute on Aging
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases
National Institute of Arthritis and
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases
National Institute on Drug
Abuse
National Institute of Mental
Health
National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke
|